-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
Closed
Labels
enhancementNew features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug)New features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug)frozen-due-to-ageIssues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussionIssues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussion
Description
This is a bit of a long shot and depends on the performance of future quic-go releases but QUIC already tends to perform better on high latency connections:
https://forum.syncthing.net/t/prefer-quic-option/19136
https://www.reddit.com/r/Syncthing/comments/ye0429/syncthing_quicserver_quickclient_disconnecting/
Seems like quic-go v0.30.0 already comes with a bunch of performance improvements and batch writing is scheduled for v0.31.0.
Once quic-go is able to saturate a gigabit link, we should change the priority for WAN connections.
As for LAN i don't see any benefits because packetloss and latency is not an issue here.
pataquets
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug)New features or improvements of some kind, as opposed to a problem (bug)frozen-due-to-ageIssues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussionIssues closed and untouched for a long time, together with being locked for discussion