Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
I would rather keep the
I think it makes sense to group all code-generation commands under a common namespace to raise their visibility to the beginning user. |
Member
Author
|
Yeah, I thought of that too, but it's semantically incorrect WRT the other commands (as said in symfony/symfony#117). And if we add other stuff to bundle, like bundle:enable for example. Then you'd have init:bundle and bundle:enable, which would suck. I agree with you for now but I think grouping by resource type is more future-proof. |
Contributor
|
I didn't realize this was the docs repo :) |
Contributor
|
i guess this can be closed now since symfony/symfony#117 was closed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should be merged if/when symfony/symfony#117 is merged