Remove Stubs.cpp and reimplement what it has in Swift.#929
Merged
Conversation
This PR removes Stubs.cpp, which currently houses some thunks for functions that are conditionally unavailable in glibc, and replaces it with runtime function lookups in Swift. Is there potentially a one-time non-zero performance cost? Yes. Is that performance cost prohibitive given that the functions are only looked up once and then cached? No. These functions won't get called on Linux if `SWT_NO_DYNAMIC_LINKING` is defined but we don't currently support that combination anyway. Even if you're using a statically-linked Swift standard library, we'd expect Linux to still support calling `dlsym()`.
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci test |
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci test |
briancroom
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2025
stmontgomery
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR removes Stubs.cpp, which currently houses some thunks for functions that are conditionally unavailable in glibc, and replaces it with runtime function lookups in Swift. Is there potentially a one-time non-zero performance cost? Yes. Is that performance cost prohibitive given that the functions are only looked up once and then cached? No.
These functions won't get called on Linux if
SWT_NO_DYNAMIC_LINKINGis defined but we don't currently support that combination anyway. Even if you're using a statically-linked Swift standard library, we'd expect Linux to still support callingdlsym().Checklist: