Skip to content

Conversation

@skme902
Copy link
Contributor

@skme902 skme902 commented Oct 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Reorganized category data model to a Root Categories → Sections → Categories hierarchy (replacing Subcategories).
    • API response structure updated to return root categories with sections and categories; field labels adjusted while preserving meanings.
    • Category listing command updated to traverse the new hierarchy while maintaining the same flattened output format for users.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Walkthrough

Refactors data model: renames and reshapes management types from Category/Subcategory to RootCategory/Category, updates Section to use Categories. Updates CLI category list traversal to iterate RootCategories → Sections → Categories and remaps flattened row fields to the new structure. No other control-flow or error handling changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Model renaming and API reshape
mgmnt/category.go
Renamed and restructured public types: introduced RootCategory, updated Section to hold Categories []Category, and repurposed former Subcategory as Category. PreferenceCategoryResponse now exposes RootCategories []RootCategory with adjusted JSON tags; serialization shapes updated accordingly.
Command traversal update
internal/commands/category/category_list.go
Updated traversal from Categories -> Sections -> Subcategories to RootCategories -> Sections -> Categories. Adjusted flattened row field mappings to pull from the new data locations; output format preserved.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Poem

I hop through roots and sections new,
Renamed paths in tidy view.
From root to leaf, the fields align,
Categories in cleaner line.
With whiskered checks, I stamp “all good!”
Then nibble docs like carrots should. 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "category response update" directly reflects the main change of reshaping the category response payload and renaming related types. It succinctly identifies that the PreferenceCategoryResponse and associated category structures are being updated. Despite its brevity, it accurately captures the core intent of the pull request without introducing unrelated details.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pref_response_update

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gauravverma gauravverma merged commit f8349cb into main Oct 14, 2025
1 check was pending
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
mgmnt/category.go (1)

22-25: Consider renaming the field for clarity.

The field RootCategory has the same name as its struct type RootCategory, which can reduce readability. Consider using a more descriptive name like Name to avoid confusion.

Example:

 type RootCategory struct {
-	RootCategory string    `json:"root_category"`
+	Name         string    `json:"root_category"`
 	Sections     []Section `json:"sections"`
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4771dbd and e62598b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/commands/category/category_list.go (1 hunks)
  • mgmnt/category.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
internal/commands/**/!(root).go

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/command-registration.mdc)

Register each subcommand by calling rootCmd.AddCommand(...) in the subcommand’s own init() function

Files:

  • internal/commands/category/category_list.go
mgmnt/**/*.go

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/cli-structure.mdc)

Place management and client-related Go code under the mgmnt/ directory

Files:

  • mgmnt/category.go
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
internal/commands/category/category_list.go (1)
mgmnt/category.go (2)
  • RootCategory (22-25)
  • Section (27-34)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
mgmnt/category.go (3)

27-34: LGTM!

The struct definition is well-formed with proper JSON tags. The renaming from Subcategories to Categories aligns with the overall refactoring.


36-43: LGTM!

The Category struct (renamed from Subcategory) is correctly defined with all necessary fields and proper JSON tags.


13-20: Verify API contract change

The rename from Categories to RootCategories alters the JSON contract. Confirm the backend now returns root_categories and that all clients consuming this struct have been updated to use RootCategories.

internal/commands/category/category_list.go (1)

50-62: LGTM!

The traversal logic correctly implements the new data model hierarchy (RootCategories → Sections → Categories). The field mappings accurately reflect the updated structure while preserving the flattened table output format.

@skme902 skme902 deleted the pref_response_update branch October 14, 2025 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants