stream.dash: refactor BaseURL.join() #6328
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
f6190ee to
4cbf109
Compare
|
Checked the refactored variant and it seems to be working because at least one segment is obtained and played correctly. There is no 404 reports in verbose log. |
- Remove `BaseURL.join()` and replace it with simple `urllib.parse.urljoin()` calls: Appending a trailing path separator is incorrect, and checking for absolute and non-empty components is unnecessary - Remove unused `BaseURL.is_absolute()` property
4cbf109 to
4220942
Compare
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BaseURL.join()and replace it with simpleurllib.parse.urljoin()calls:Appending a trailing path separator is incorrect, and checking for absolute and non-empty components is unnecessary
BaseURL.is_absolute()propertyFixes #6327
As said in the linked issue, I have no idea why the weird
parts[2] += "/"logic was added in the initial DASH implementation.urllib.parse.urljoin()is IETF RFC 3986 compliant, which is what's required by ISO/IEC 23009-1:2022 5.6.4 (BaseURL processing section of the DASH standard).@zhenyahacker please have a look and check if that's working for you. Thanks.