Skip to content

chore(ionitron): don't mark feature requests as stale#3234

Merged
rwaskiewicz merged 1 commit intomainfrom
rwaskiewicz/ionitron-dont-mark-feature-asks-as-stale
Feb 7, 2022
Merged

chore(ionitron): don't mark feature requests as stale#3234
rwaskiewicz merged 1 commit intomainfrom
rwaskiewicz/ionitron-dont-mark-feature-asks-as-stale

Conversation

@rwaskiewicz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rwaskiewicz rwaskiewicz commented Feb 7, 2022

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • Build (npm run build) was run locally and any changes were pushed
  • Unit tests (npm test) were run locally and passed
  • E2E Tests (npm run test.karma.prod) were run locally and passed
  • Prettier (npm run prettier) was run locally and passed

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe): GitHub Integration changes

What is the current behavior?

ionitron can mark issues with the "Feature: Want this? Upvote it!" label as stale

GitHub Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

make issues with the label "Feature: Want this? Upvote it!" exempt from
ionitron marking such issues as stale. it's an acceptable situation
where we get a totally valid issue/feature request, we mark it as such,
but it's not the top of the backlog. we should be performing manual
checks of these for now (although making this smarter in the future to
look at the number of votes/comments and taking those into account would
be ideal)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Testing

I didn't test this, although I'm "pretty sure" (famous last words) that I'm using the double quotes properly in this YAML file (since the label contains a colon). The tricky part here is Ionitron marks such issues after 180 days of inactivity, and I don't want to move that value down at the risk of marking more issues accidentally.

Other information

The impetus for this PR is #2648 being marked as stale incorrectly over the weekend.

make issues with the label "Feature: Want this? Upvote it!" exempt from
ionitron marking such issues as stale. it's an acceptable situation
where we get a totally valid issue/feature request, we mark it as such,
but it's not the top of the backlog. we should be performing manual
checks of these for now (although making this smarter in the future to
look at the number of votes/comments and taking those into account would
be ideal)
@rwaskiewicz rwaskiewicz requested a review from a team February 7, 2022 16:30
@rwaskiewicz rwaskiewicz merged commit 1c15004 into main Feb 7, 2022
@rwaskiewicz rwaskiewicz deleted the rwaskiewicz/ionitron-dont-mark-feature-asks-as-stale branch February 7, 2022 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants