Skip to content

Remove outdated WIP label from ABI link#9568

Merged
orizi merged 2 commits intostarkware-libs:mainfrom
alizfara112:docs04
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

Remove outdated WIP label from ABI link#9568
orizi merged 2 commits intostarkware-libs:mainfrom
alizfara112:docs04

Conversation

@alizfara112
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Removes the (WIP) marker from the Application Binary Interface (ABI) reference link in the memory model documentation.

Type of change

  • Documentation change with concrete technical impact

Why is this change needed?

The ABI documentation has matured and is frequently referenced as a stable source. Retaining the "Work In Progress" label is now misleading and may cause developers to doubt the reliability of the specification.

What was the behavior or documentation before?

The link was suffixed with (WIP).

What is the behavior or documentation after?

The link is presented as a finalized reference.

Additional context

This aligns the documentation with the current stability status of the Starknet ABI.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@orizi orizi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

@orizi reviewed 1 file and all commit messages, and made 1 comment.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alizfara112).

@orizi orizi enabled auto-merge January 29, 2026 15:30
@orizi orizi added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2026
Merged via the queue into starkware-libs:main with commit 96884d5 Jan 29, 2026
55 checks passed
This was referenced Mar 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants