
[[el-access]]
== Expression-Based Access Control
Spring Security 3.0 introduced the ability to use Spring EL expressions as an authorization mechanism in addition to the simple use of configuration attributes and access-decision voters which have seen before.
Expression-based access control is built on the same architecture but allows complicated Boolean logic to be encapsulated in a single expression.


=== Overview
Spring Security uses Spring EL for expression support and you should look at how that works if you are interested in understanding the topic in more depth.
Expressions are evaluated with a "root object" as part of the evaluation context.
Spring Security uses specific classes for web and method security as the root object, in order to provide built-in expressions and access to values such as the current principal.


[[el-common-built-in]]
==== Common Built-In Expressions
The base class for expression root objects is `SecurityExpressionRoot`.
This provides some common expressions which are available in both web and method security.

[[common-expressions]]
.Common built-in expressions
|===
| Expression | Description

| `hasRole([role])`
| Returns `true` if the current principal has the specified role.
By default if the supplied role does not start with 'ROLE_' it will be added.
This can be customized by modifying the `defaultRolePrefix` on `DefaultWebSecurityExpressionHandler`.

| `hasAnyRole([role1,role2])`
| Returns `true` if the current principal has any of the supplied roles (given as a comma-separated list of strings).
By default if the supplied role does not start with 'ROLE_' it will be added.
This can be customized by modifying the `defaultRolePrefix` on `DefaultWebSecurityExpressionHandler`.

| `hasAuthority([authority])`
| Returns `true` if the current principal has the specified authority.

| `hasAnyAuthority([authority1,authority2])`
| Returns `true` if the current principal has any of the supplied authorities (given as a comma-separated list of strings)

| `principal`
| Allows direct access to the principal object representing the current user

| `authentication`
| Allows direct access to the current `Authentication` object obtained from the `SecurityContext`

| `permitAll`
| Always evaluates to `true`

| `denyAll`
| Always evaluates to `false`

| `isAnonymous()`
| Returns `true` if the current principal is an anonymous user

| `isRememberMe()`
| Returns `true` if the current principal is a remember-me user

| `isAuthenticated()`
| Returns `true` if the user is not anonymous

| `isFullyAuthenticated()`
| Returns `true` if the user is not an anonymous or a remember-me user

| `hasPermission(Object target, Object permission)`
| Returns `true` if the user has access to the provided target for the given permission.
For example, `hasPermission(domainObject, 'read')`

| `hasPermission(Object targetId, String targetType, Object permission)`
| Returns `true` if the user has access to the provided target for the given permission.
For example, `hasPermission(1, 'com.example.domain.Message', 'read')`
|===



[[el-access-web]]
=== Web Security Expressions
To use expressions to secure individual URLs, you would first need to set the `use-expressions` attribute in the `<http>` element to `true`.
Spring Security will then expect the `access` attributes of the `<intercept-url>` elements to contain Spring EL expressions.
The expressions should evaluate to a Boolean, defining whether access should be allowed or not.
For example:

[source,xml]
----

<http>
	<intercept-url pattern="/admin*"
		access="hasRole('admin') and hasIpAddress('192.168.1.0/24')"/>
	...
</http>

----

Here we have defined that the "admin" area of an application (defined by the URL pattern) should only be available to users who have the granted authority "admin" and whose IP address matches a local subnet.
We've already seen the built-in `hasRole` expression in the previous section.
The expression `hasIpAddress` is an additional built-in expression which is specific to web security.
It is defined by the `WebSecurityExpressionRoot` class, an instance of which is used as the expression root object when evaluation web-access expressions.
This object also directly exposed the `HttpServletRequest` object under the name `request` so you can invoke the request directly in an expression.
If expressions are being used, a `WebExpressionVoter` will be added to the `AccessDecisionManager` which is used by the namespace.
So if you aren't using the namespace and want to use expressions, you will have to add one of these to your configuration.

[[el-access-web-beans]]
==== Referring to Beans in Web Security Expressions

If you wish to extend the expressions that are available, you can easily refer to any Spring Bean you expose.
For example, assuming you have a Bean with the name of `webSecurity` that contains the following method signature:

[source,java]
----
public class WebSecurity {
		public boolean check(Authentication authentication, HttpServletRequest request) {
				...
		}
}
----

You could refer to the method using:

[source,xml]
----
<http>
	<intercept-url pattern="/user/**"
		access="@webSecurity.check(authentication,request)"/>
	...
</http>
----

or in Java configuration


[source,java]
----
http
		.authorizeRequests()
				.antMatchers("/user/**").access("@webSecurity.check(authentication,request)")
				...
----

[[el-access-web-path-variables]]
==== Path Variables in Web Security Expressions

At times it is nice to be able to refer to path variables within a URL.
For example, consider a RESTful application that looks up a user by id from the URL path in the format `/user/{userId}`.

You can easily refer to the path variable by placing it in the pattern.
For example, if you had a Bean with the name of `webSecurity` that contains the following method signature:

[source,java]
----
public class WebSecurity {
		public boolean checkUserId(Authentication authentication, int id) {
				...
		}
}
----

You could refer to the method using:

[source,xml]
----
<http>
	<intercept-url pattern="/user/{userId}/**"
		access="@webSecurity.checkUserId(authentication,#userId)"/>
	...
</http>
----

or in Java configuration

[source,java]
----
http
		.authorizeRequests()
				.antMatchers("/user/{userId}/**").access("@webSecurity.checkUserId(authentication,#userId)")
				...
----

In both configurations URLs that match would pass in the path variable (and convert it) into checkUserId method.
For example, if the URL were `/user/123/resource`, then the id passed in would be `123`.

=== Method Security Expressions
Method security is a bit more complicated than a simple allow or deny rule.
Spring Security 3.0 introduced some new annotations in order to allow comprehensive support for the use of expressions.


[[el-pre-post-annotations]]
==== @Pre and @Post Annotations
There are four annotations which support expression attributes to allow pre and post-invocation authorization checks and also to support filtering of submitted collection arguments or return values.
They are `@PreAuthorize`, `@PreFilter`, `@PostAuthorize` and `@PostFilter`.
Their use is enabled through the `global-method-security` namespace element:

[source,xml]
----
<global-method-security pre-post-annotations="enabled"/>
----

===== Access Control using @PreAuthorize and @PostAuthorize
The most obviously useful annotation is `@PreAuthorize` which decides whether a method can actually be invoked or not.
For example (from the"Contacts" sample application)

[source,java]
----
@PreAuthorize("hasRole('USER')")
public void create(Contact contact);
----

which means that access will only be allowed for users with the role "ROLE_USER".
Obviously the same thing could easily be achieved using a traditional configuration and a simple configuration attribute for the required role.
But what about:

[source,java]
----
@PreAuthorize("hasPermission(#contact, 'admin')")
public void deletePermission(Contact contact, Sid recipient, Permission permission);
----

Here we're actually using a method argument as part of the expression to decide whether the current user has the "admin"permission for the given contact.
The built-in `hasPermission()` expression is linked into the Spring Security ACL module through the application context, as we'll<<el-permission-evaluator,see below>>.
You can access any of the method arguments by name as expression variables.

There are a number of ways in which Spring Security can resolve the method arguments.
Spring Security uses `DefaultSecurityParameterNameDiscoverer` to discover the parameter names.
By default, the following options are tried for a method as a whole.

* If Spring Security's `@P` annotation is present on a single argument to the method, the value will be used.
This is useful for interfaces compiled with a JDK prior to JDK 8 which do not contain any information about the parameter names.
For example:

+

[source,java]
----
import org.springframework.security.access.method.P;

...

@PreAuthorize("#c.name == authentication.name")
public void doSomething(@P("c") Contact contact);
----

+

Behind the scenes this use implemented using `AnnotationParameterNameDiscoverer` which can be customized to support the value attribute of any specified annotation.

* If Spring Data's `@Param` annotation is present on at least one parameter for the method, the value will be used.
This is useful for interfaces compiled with a JDK prior to JDK 8 which do not contain any information about the parameter names.
For example:

+

[source,java]
----
import org.springframework.data.repository.query.Param;

...

@PreAuthorize("#n == authentication.name")
Contact findContactByName(@Param("n") String name);
----

+

Behind the scenes this use implemented using `AnnotationParameterNameDiscoverer` which can be customized to support the value attribute of any specified annotation.

* If JDK 8 was used to compile the source with the -parameters argument and Spring 4+ is being used, then the standard JDK reflection API is used to discover the parameter names.
This works on both classes and interfaces.

* Last, if the code was compiled with the debug symbols, the parameter names will be discovered using the debug symbols.
This will not work for interfaces since they do not have debug information about the parameter names.
For interfaces, annotations or the JDK 8 approach must be used.

.[[el-pre-post-annotations-spel]]
--
Any Spring-EL functionality is available within the expression, so you can also access properties on the arguments.
For example, if you wanted a particular method to only allow access to a user whose username matched that of the contact, you could write
--

[source,java]
----
@PreAuthorize("#contact.name == authentication.name")
public void doSomething(Contact contact);
----

Here we are accessing another built-in expression, `authentication`, which is the `Authentication` stored in the security context.
You can also access its "principal" property directly, using the expression `principal`.
The value will often be a `UserDetails` instance, so you might use an expression like `principal.username` or `principal.enabled`.

.[[el-pre-post-annotations-post]]
--
Less commonly, you may wish to perform an access-control check after the method has been invoked.
This can be achieved using the `@PostAuthorize` annotation.
To access the return value from a method, use the built-in name `returnObject` in the expression.
--

===== Filtering using @PreFilter and @PostFilter
As you may already be aware, Spring Security supports filtering of collections and arrays and this can now be achieved using expressions.
This is most commonly performed on the return value of a method.
For example:

[source,java]
----
@PreAuthorize("hasRole('USER')")
@PostFilter("hasPermission(filterObject, 'read') or hasPermission(filterObject, 'admin')")
public List<Contact> getAll();
----

When using the `@PostFilter` annotation, Spring Security iterates through the returned collection and removes any elements for which the supplied expression is false.
The name `filterObject` refers to the current object in the collection.
You can also filter before the method call, using `@PreFilter`, though this is a less common requirement.
The syntax is just the same, but if there is more than one argument which is a collection type then you have to select one by name using the `filterTarget` property of this annotation.

Note that filtering is obviously not a substitute for tuning your data retrieval queries.
If you are filtering large collections and removing many of the entries then this is likely to be inefficient.


[[el-method-built-in]]
==== Built-In Expressions
There are some built-in expressions which are specific to method security, which we have already seen in use above.
The `filterTarget` and `returnValue` values are simple enough, but the use of the `hasPermission()` expression warrants a closer look.


[[el-permission-evaluator]]
===== The PermissionEvaluator interface
`hasPermission()` expressions are delegated to an instance of `PermissionEvaluator`.
It is intended to bridge between the expression system and Spring Security's ACL system, allowing you to specify authorization constraints on domain objects, based on abstract permissions.
It has no explicit dependencies on the ACL module, so you could swap that out for an alternative implementation if required.
The interface has two methods:

[source,java]
----
boolean hasPermission(Authentication authentication, Object targetDomainObject,
							Object permission);

boolean hasPermission(Authentication authentication, Serializable targetId,
							String targetType, Object permission);
----

which map directly to the available versions of the expression, with the exception that the first argument (the `Authentication` object) is not supplied.
The first is used in situations where the domain object, to which access is being controlled, is already loaded.
Then expression will return true if the current user has the given permission for that object.
The second version is used in cases where the object is not loaded, but its identifier is known.
An abstract "type" specifier for the domain object is also required, allowing the correct ACL permissions to be loaded.
This has traditionally been the Java class of the object, but does not have to be as long as it is consistent with how the permissions are loaded.

To use `hasPermission()` expressions, you have to explicitly configure a `PermissionEvaluator` in your application context.
This would look something like this:

[source,xml]
----
<security:global-method-security pre-post-annotations="enabled">
<security:expression-handler ref="expressionHandler"/>
</security:global-method-security>

<bean id="expressionHandler" class=
"org.springframework.security.access.expression.method.DefaultMethodSecurityExpressionHandler">
	<property name="permissionEvaluator" ref="myPermissionEvaluator"/>
</bean>
----

Where `myPermissionEvaluator` is the bean which implements `PermissionEvaluator`.
Usually this will be the implementation from the ACL module which is called `AclPermissionEvaluator`.
See the "Contacts" sample application configuration for more details.

===== Method Security Meta Annotations

You can make use of meta annotations for method security to make your code more readable.
This is especially convenient if you find that you are repeating the same complex expression throughout your code base.
For example, consider the following:

[source,java]
----
@PreAuthorize("#contact.name == authentication.name")
----

Instead of repeating this everywhere, we can create a meta annotation that can be used instead.

[source,java]
----
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@PreAuthorize("#contact.name == authentication.name")
public @interface ContactPermission {}
----

Meta annotations can be used for any of the Spring Security method security annotations.
In order to remain compliant with the specification JSR-250 annotations do not support meta annotations.

