@picnixz -- this has conflicts now, please may you resolve?

A

Checking my understanding of this feature, as a non-blocking comment: this feature essentially trims the anchor component of matching URL patterns, resulting in the containing page URL being checked, with presence of the anchor unchecked.

Thank you for reorganizing the CHANGELOG (from one PR to another, I always forget whether I should put it at the top or the bottom of the changelist 😅) and correcting my English !

No worries, it's a subtle feature to describe -- I went with "skip verifying that the anchors exist" as I think it captures what/why a user would gain from enabling the feature.

I'm going to do a review of CHANGES just now before the release (hopefully later today), so will fix order then -- I tend to go for the order in which features were added.

A