Skip to content

Fix the parsing logic in the MatcherRegistry#2324

Merged
joelrosario merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-matcher-parse
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

Fix the parsing logic in the MatcherRegistry#2324
joelrosario merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix-matcher-parse

Conversation

@StarKhan6368
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What: Fix the parsing logic in the MatcherRegistry for given key and value

Why: The MatchesRegistry.parse method could generate false positives when the leaf key corresponds to a recognized matcher key. For instance, with the key body.nested.match and the value 42, it would incorrectly assume that 42 is a value to be parsed against the CompositeMatcher

Checklist:

  • Unit Tests
  • Build passing locally
  • Sonar Quality Gate
  • Security scans don't report any vulnerabilities
  • Documentation added/updated (share link)
  • Sample Project added/updated (share link)
  • Demo video (share link)
  • Article on Website (share link)
  • Roadmpap updated (share link)
  • Conference Talk (share link)

- Ensure false positives don't occur
- Add simple tests for the same
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Summary

Line coverage Branch coverage

Assembly Line coverage Branch coverage
application 63.4% 55.5%
application/backwardCompatibility 79.5% 65.1%
application/mcp 84.7% 76.9%
application/validate 1.2% 2.5%
io/specmatic/conversions 93.2% 78.7%
io/specmatic/conversions/lenient 97.6% 77.4%
io/specmatic/core 81.5% 62.9%
io/specmatic/core/azure 0% 0%
io/specmatic/core/config 61.6% 39.4%
io/specmatic/core/config/v1 97.9% 25%
io/specmatic/core/config/v2 91.9% 78.8%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3 56.7% 30.1%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components 78.9% 40%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/runOptions 75.4% 47.5%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/services 89.4% 59.6%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/settings 100% 63.8%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/sources 83.8% 61.5%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/specmatic 57.6% 25%
io/specmatic/core/discriminator 52.6% 50%
io/specmatic/core/examples/module 45.7% 28.9%
io/specmatic/core/examples/server 73.8% 36.8%
io/specmatic/core/filters 83.1% 72.1%
io/specmatic/core/fuzzy 97.3% 93.8%
io/specmatic/core/git 9% 10.8%
io/specmatic/core/jsonoperator 67.8% 69.5%
io/specmatic/core/jsonoperator/value 86.2% 74.4%
io/specmatic/core/lifecycle 0% ****
io/specmatic/core/log 75.9% 62.3%
io/specmatic/core/matchers 78.9% 64.2%
io/specmatic/core/overlay 87.3% 58.8%
io/specmatic/core/pattern 87.3% 76.7%
io/specmatic/core/pattern/config 100% ****
io/specmatic/core/pattern/regex 94.5% 87.5%
io/specmatic/core/report 97.5% 91.6%
io/specmatic/core/route/modules 95% 87.5%
io/specmatic/core/utilities 69.5% 61%
io/specmatic/core/value 82.4% 69.2%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser 81.4% 41%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser/message 90% 72%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser/operation 100% 100%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/payload 81.1% 50%
io/specmatic/junit5/support 0% ****
io/specmatic/loader 84.6% 53.5%
io/specmatic/mcp/constants 0% ****
io/specmatic/mcp/report 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test/client 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test/client/model 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mock 61.4% 56.5%
io/specmatic/proxy 67% 52%
io/specmatic/specmatic/core 100% ****
io/specmatic/specmatic/executable 100% ****
io/specmatic/specmatic/mcp 0% ****
io/specmatic/stub 78.6% 68%
io/specmatic/stub/listener 100% 100%
io/specmatic/stub/report 100% 77%
io/specmatic/test 73.5% 63.2%
io/specmatic/test/asserts 95.2% 86.6%
io/specmatic/test/handlers 89.7% 63.3%
io/specmatic/test/listeners 86.4% 53.2%
io/specmatic/test/reports 60% 33.3%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage 97.2% 54.9%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage/console 90.2% 84%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage/html 0% 0%
io/specmatic/test/reports/renderers 21.8% 24.1%
io/specmatic/test/utils 92.3% 80%

@joelrosario joelrosario self-requested a review March 6, 2026 13:41
@joelrosario joelrosario merged commit 8c5ffe5 into main Mar 6, 2026
3 checks passed
@joelrosario joelrosario deleted the fix-matcher-parse branch March 6, 2026 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants