Skip to content

Don't create .specmatic folder. A git clone operation will create the appropriate directory, so this is redundant#2291

Merged
joelrosario merged 1 commit intomainfrom
do-not-create-specmatic-folder
Feb 22, 2026
Merged

Don't create .specmatic folder. A git clone operation will create the appropriate directory, so this is redundant#2291
joelrosario merged 1 commit intomainfrom
do-not-create-specmatic-folder

Conversation

@ketan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ketan ketan commented Feb 20, 2026

No description provided.

@ketan
Don't create .specmatic folder. A git clone operation will create…
6cc4ddc 
… the appropriate directory, so this is redundant
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Summary

Line coverage Branch coverage

Assembly Line coverage Branch coverage
application 58.7% 51.8%
application/backwardCompatibility 77.2% 62.1%
application/mcp 84.3% 89.2%
application/validate 1.3% 0%
io/specmatic/conversions 93.2% 80.9%
io/specmatic/conversions/lenient 93.9% 79.4%
io/specmatic/core 79.9% 62.6%
io/specmatic/core/azure 0% 0%
io/specmatic/core/config 57.7% 32.7%
io/specmatic/core/config/v1 98% 25%
io/specmatic/core/config/v2 91.9% 77.5%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3 49.5% 24.6%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components 71.4% 40%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/runOptions 73% 44.7%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/services 58.6% 50%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/settings 98.3% 50%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/components/sources 80% 59%
io/specmatic/core/config/v3/specmatic 69.2% 37.5%
io/specmatic/core/discriminator 53.2% 43.1%
io/specmatic/core/examples/module 43.3% 24.5%
io/specmatic/core/examples/server 70.4% 35.7%
io/specmatic/core/filters 83.3% 75.9%
io/specmatic/core/fuzzy 95.8% 92.7%
io/specmatic/core/git 8.1% 12.8%
io/specmatic/core/jsonoperator 58.4% 68.6%
io/specmatic/core/jsonoperator/value 85.7% 75.9%
io/specmatic/core/lifecycle 0% ****
io/specmatic/core/log 72.7% 52.8%
io/specmatic/core/matchers 76.7% 62.6%
io/specmatic/core/overlay 85.7% 58.3%
io/specmatic/core/pattern 87.1% 76.3%
io/specmatic/core/pattern/config 100% ****
io/specmatic/core/pattern/regex 94% 86.5%
io/specmatic/core/report 97.7% 92.8%
io/specmatic/core/route/modules 95.4% 87.5%
io/specmatic/core/utilities 64.8% 56.5%
io/specmatic/core/value 81.4% 71.5%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser 80.9% 41.4%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser/message 88.6% 67.8%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/parser/operation 100% 100%
io/specmatic/core/wsdl/payload 71.7% 33.3%
io/specmatic/junit5/support 0% ****
io/specmatic/loader 80.4% 50.8%
io/specmatic/mcp/constants 0% ****
io/specmatic/mcp/report 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test/client 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mcp/test/client/model 0% 0%
io/specmatic/mock 60.9% 57.3%
io/specmatic/proxy 66.5% 48.6%
io/specmatic/specmatic/core 100% ****
io/specmatic/specmatic/executable 100% ****
io/specmatic/specmatic/mcp 0% ****
io/specmatic/stub 77.3% 68.8%
io/specmatic/stub/listener 96.8% 90%
io/specmatic/stub/report 98.1% 75%
io/specmatic/test 73.6% 61.7%
io/specmatic/test/asserts 92.1% 86.6%
io/specmatic/test/fixtures **** ****
io/specmatic/test/handlers 90.3% 63.5%
io/specmatic/test/listeners 84.2% 54%
io/specmatic/test/matchers **** ****
io/specmatic/test/reports 69% 36.4%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage 96.9% 53.9%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage/console 85.8% 81%
io/specmatic/test/reports/coverage/html 0% 0%
io/specmatic/test/reports/renderers 12.4% 14%
io/specmatic/test/utils 92.1% 82%

@nashjain nashjain requested a review from joelrosario February 22, 2026 09:15
@joelrosario joelrosario merged commit 22553a0 into main Feb 22, 2026
3 checks passed
@joelrosario joelrosario deleted the do-not-create-specmatic-folder branch February 22, 2026 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@joelrosario joelrosario Awaiting requested review from joelrosario

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ketan @joelrosario