This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2024. It is now read-only.
codeintel: document that pagination for usages might return extra results#64142
Merged
Conversation
varungandhi-src
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not actually sure if I can even guarantee the at least part for syntactic usages right now. It would require particularily pathological circumstances, but because I have to stay within the given
context.Contextwindow, I might end up returning fewer syntactic results than requested.I think that should be fixable in the future so I'd still like the spec to reflect the state we'd like to end up at.
Test plan
Just a documentation/specification change