Update the legacy link to sg doc#64017
Conversation
|
We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA), and we don't have yours on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign CLA to get yourself added. Sourcegraph teammates should refer to Accepting contributions for guidance. |
| ## Local development | ||
|
|
||
| Use `sg` CLI tool to configure and start local development server. For more information check out [the `sg` documentation](https://docs-legacy.sourcegraph.com/dev/background-information/sg). | ||
| Use `sg` CLI tool to configure and start local development server. For more information check out [the `sg` documentation](https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/blob/main/doc/dev/background-information/sg/index.md). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @ykdojo
I think I'm lacking some context here.
Why are we moving from the legacy doc link to github?
If this is required, I think linking to a sourcegraph link is a better alternative to github.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking it might make sense to make sure it's up-to-date (as opposed to it being legacy).
I think linking to a sourcegraph link is a better alternative to github.
This sounds good! Happy to update the PR with it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ack.
I think we can make use of a sourcegraph link instead of linking to GitHub then.
cc @jhchabran for viz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated it. The hash links don't seem to work, though: https://sourcegraph.slack.com/archives/C05MW2TMYAV/p1722379724954569
…cegraph/sourcegraph into update-lagcy-link-to-sg-doc
Test plan
Check each new link manually