Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2024. It is now read-only.

feat(ci): docker-images runtype#62708

Merged
jhchabran merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jsm/docker-images-candidates-notest
May 27, 2024
Merged

feat(ci): docker-images runtype#62708
jhchabran merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jsm/docker-images-candidates-notest

Conversation

@jamesmcnamara

@jamesmcnamara jamesmcnamara commented May 15, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Following up on this thread, the conclusion was to create a new runtype with the behavior of main-dry-run with push_prod=true. I created the run type and just included it everywhere the main-dry-run type was used.

I don't understand how that accomplishes what docker-images-candidates-notest was doing, but c'est la vie.

Test plan

Will run on buildkite.

(EDIT @jhchabran): https://buildkite.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/builds/275755#018fb9e2-98b1-45e7-b311-7d420c8edc8e

@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label May 15, 2024
@jamesmcnamara jamesmcnamara requested a review from jhchabran May 15, 2024 23:05
@jhchabran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I don't understand how that accomplishes what docker-images-candidates-notest was doing, but c'est la vie.

It was building and shipping containers while skipping the tests. It was the escape hatch for emergency scenarios where you need an image right now. Did you ask on Slack somewhere about this ?

@jhchabran jhchabran force-pushed the jsm/docker-images-candidates-notest branch from 8acb185 to daeb2c2 Compare May 27, 2024 12:21
@jhchabran jhchabran merged commit 69b1bfb into main May 27, 2024
@jhchabran jhchabran deleted the jsm/docker-images-candidates-notest branch May 27, 2024 12:45
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants