Skip to content

[action] [PR:9048] test_radv_ipv6_ra is unnecessarily skipped on non-dualtor topology#9299

Merged
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202305from
mssonicbld:cherry/202305/9048
Aug 4, 2023
Merged

[action] [PR:9048] test_radv_ipv6_ra is unnecessarily skipped on non-dualtor topology#9299
mssonicbld merged 1 commit intosonic-net:202305from
mssonicbld:cherry/202305/9048

Conversation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description of PR

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 201911
  • 202012
  • 202205

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

Script test_radv_ipv6_ra.py is unnecessarily skipped on non-dualtor topology. The reason is that this script uses fixture toggle_all_simulator_ports_to_upper_tor which depends on cable_type fixture.

The cable_type fixture requires that the topology must has "dualtor", otherwise skip the test.

How did you do it?

This change updated the test_radv_ipv6_ra.py to use fixture toggle_all_simulator_ports_to_random_side.

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

…onic-net#9048)

What is the motivation for this PR?
Script test_radv_ipv6_ra.py is unnecessarily skipped on non-dualtor topology. The reason is that this script uses fixture toggle_all_simulator_ports_to_upper_tor which depends on cable_type fixture.

The cable_type fixture requires that the topology must has "dualtor", otherwise skip the test.

How did you do it?
This change updated the test_radv_ipv6_ra.py to use fixture toggle_all_simulator_ports_to_random_side.

Signed-off-by: Xin Wang <xiwang5@microsoft.com>
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Original PR: #9048

@mssonicbld mssonicbld merged commit 0f1334f into sonic-net:202305 Aug 4, 2023
@mssonicbld mssonicbld deleted the cherry/202305/9048 branch February 4, 2024 09:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants