Is it platform specific
generic
Importance or Severity
High
Description of the bug
With changes introduced by PR 18161.
There is mismatch between port channel names in global and asic.
The name change is done in file ansible/templates/minigraph_dpg.j2 but we need corresponding change in ansible/templates/minigraph_dpg_asic.j2 so the name are same in both global and asic.
the dpg_asic has still old way of naming
{% set port_channel_intf=';'.join(vm_asic_ifnames[vms[index]]) %}
PortChannel{{ '10' + ((index+1)|string) }}
{{ port_channel_intf }}
Steps to Reproduce
do gen-mg for multiasic platform, generated minigraph will have different Portchannel names under host vs asic
Actual Behavior and Expected Behavior
Port channel names should be same
Relevant log output
Output of show version
Attach files (if any)
No response
Is it platform specific
generic
Importance or Severity
High
Description of the bug
With changes introduced by PR 18161.
There is mismatch between port channel names in global and asic.
The name change is done in file ansible/templates/minigraph_dpg.j2 but we need corresponding change in ansible/templates/minigraph_dpg_asic.j2 so the name are same in both global and asic.
the dpg_asic has still old way of naming
{% set port_channel_intf=';'.join(vm_asic_ifnames[vms[index]]) %}
PortChannel{{ '10' + ((index+1)|string) }}
{{ port_channel_intf }}
Steps to Reproduce
do gen-mg for multiasic platform, generated minigraph will have different Portchannel names under host vs asic
Actual Behavior and Expected Behavior
Port channel names should be same
Relevant log output
Output of
show versionAttach files (if any)
No response