Merged
Conversation
|
|
m1n0
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2026
Contributor
m1n0
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for doing this! Switching to uv in release flows would be nice as well!
Contributor
Author
I'm adding that now, no reason not to really, just missed my attention |
Contributor
Author
Ah no, I didn't miss it, just the release use to be separate file etc, it's all in main release now, so all good! |
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This change brings UV into the ecosystem, including a shared lockfile. This brings more deployment confidence, and greatly reduces installation times too, from local tests - with packages already downloaded and cached:
Checklist