Closed
Conversation
Solves error when using node 17 (and later): Error: error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported See: webpack/webpack#14532
Contributor
Author
|
@PeterSchafer hopefully this small PR passes all tests and is very easy to merge :) |
1 task
Contributor
|
Your PR has not had any activity for 30 days. In 2 days I'll close it. Make some activity to remove this. |
Contributor
|
Your PR has now been stale for 2 days. I'm closing it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
upgrade webpack to 5.74.0
Solves error when using node 17 (and later):
Error: error:0308010C:digital envelope routines::unsupported
This error occurs whenever running
npmwhich is very annoying - I'm greatly looking forward to never seeing it again.See: webpack/webpack#14532
Where should the reviewer start?
Run the build, tests, etc
How should this be manually tested?
Run the build, tests, etc
Any background context you want to provide?
I'm splitting out some of the changes in #3875 into separate PRs for easier review/merging.
What are the relevant tickets?
n/a
Screenshots
n/a
Additional questions
n/a