chore: do not compare checksum after tailwind download, as the returned CSS is not stable for even the same release#3182
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@johanneskoester has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Asset
participant DownloadService
User->>Asset: Request to get content
Asset->>DownloadService: Attempt to download asset
DownloadService-->>Asset: Return content
Asset->>Asset: Compute SHA-256 hash of content
alt Checksum matches
Asset-->>User: Return content
else Checksum mismatch
Asset-->>User: Raise AssetDownloadError with details
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
snakemake/assets/__init__.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake/assets/__init__.py (1)
Pattern **/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
snakemake/assets/__init__.py (2)
35-39: LGTM! Improved error handling for checksum mismatches.
The enhanced error message with computed checksum and content preview will greatly help in debugging download issues.
35-39: Update documentation for enhanced error messages.
Since the error handling behavior has been improved, consider updating the documentation to:
- Describe the new error message format
- Explain how to interpret the checksum and content preview for troubleshooting
Let's check the existing documentation:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for asset-related documentation
fd -e md -e rst . "docs/" | xargs rg -l "Asset|asset"Would you like me to help draft the documentation updates?
|
Please format your code with black: |
|
QC
docs/) is updated to reflect the changes or this is not necessary (e.g. if the change does neither modify the language nor the behavior or functionalities of Snakemake).Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores