Skip to content

fix: cache conda envs to fix performance regression introduced in https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/pull/1300#3093

Merged
johanneskoester merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/cache-conda-env
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

fix: cache conda envs to fix performance regression introduced in https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/pull/1300#3093
johanneskoester merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/cache-conda-env

Conversation

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@johanneskoester johanneskoester commented Sep 19, 2024

QC

  • The PR contains a test case for the changes or the changes are already covered by an existing test case.
  • The documentation (docs/) is updated to reflect the changes or this is not necessary (e.g. if the change does neither modify the language nor the behavior or functionalities of Snakemake).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a caching mechanism for the conda environment expansion, improving performance by reducing redundant computations.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced logic for determining cacheability of the conda environment, ensuring accurate evaluations.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a caching mechanism for the expand_conda_env method in the Rule class within snakemake/rules.py. A new private variable _expanded_conda_env is added to track whether the conda environment has been expanded. The method checks this variable to return cached values when applicable, refining the logic for determining cacheability based on whether the conda environment is callable or contains wildcards. This modification aims to enhance efficiency by reducing redundant computations.

Changes

File Change Summary
snakemake/rules.py Added _NOT_CACHED as a private object; modified expand_conda_env method to implement caching logic.

Possibly related PRs


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9ce4a3 and 8d34b85.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • snakemake/rules.py (6 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
snakemake/rules.py (1)

Pattern **/*.py: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the self argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of the cls argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain a return statement.

Additional comments not posted (6)
snakemake/rules.py (6)

70-70: LGTM!

Defining _NOT_CACHED as a private sentinel object is a good practice to indicate that a value has not been cached yet.


99-99: LGTM!

Initializing _expanded_conda_env to _NOT_CACHED is a good way to track whether the conda environment for the rule has been expanded yet.


1069-1070: Introduce caching for expanded conda environment.

The added check to return the cached value of _expanded_conda_env if it's not _NOT_CACHED is a good optimization. It avoids redundant computation of the expanded conda environment when the result is already available.


1081-1090: Refine caching logic for conda environment.

The updated logic for determining whether the conda environment is cacheable looks good:

  • If conda_env is not callable and doesn't contain wildcards, it's cacheable.
  • If conda_env is callable, the input function is applied, and caching is disabled since the result may vary.
  • Returning None if the input function returns None handles that case appropriately.

1113-1114: Store expanded conda environment for caching.

Storing the expanded conda environment in _expanded_conda_env when it's cacheable is the correct way to complete the caching mechanism. This allows the cached value to be reused in subsequent calls, improving performance.


28-28: LGTM!

Importing the contains_wildcard function is necessary for the added caching logic to determine if a conda environment contains wildcards.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@johanneskoester johanneskoester merged commit 66600c4 into main Sep 19, 2024
@johanneskoester johanneskoester deleted the fix/cache-conda-env branch September 19, 2024 14:16
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[8.20.4](v8.20.3...v8.20.4)
(2024-09-20)


### Bug Fixes

* cache conda envs to fix performance regression introduced in
#1300
([#3093](#3093))
([66600c4](66600c4))
* Flatten conda pip dependencies for report rule info
([#3085](#3085))
([56a1f20](56a1f20))
* improve runtime complexity of post-job checkpoint handling
([#3096](#3096))
([ba30781](ba30781))


### Documentation

* Clarify the lookup function docstring
([#3091](#3091))
([94177d5](94177d5))
* Update lookup signature
([#3090](#3090))
([655d6a1](655d6a1))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant