Skip to content

Conversation

@vegeris
Copy link
Contributor

@vegeris vegeris commented Sep 12, 2025

Summary

Adding a beta pkg to npm

Requirements (place an x in each [ ])

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.77%. Comparing base (d4231dd) to head (fa033b5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on feat-work-objects.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           feat-work-objects    #2366   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              92.77%   92.77%           
==================================================
  Files                     39       39           
  Lines                  10693    10693           
  Branches                 692      692           
==================================================
  Hits                    9920     9920           
  Misses                   761      761           
  Partials                  12       12           
Flag Coverage Δ
cli-hooks 95.23% <ø> (ø)
cli-test 94.80% <ø> (ø)
webhook 96.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@vegeris vegeris force-pushed the feat-work-objects-beta-bump-types branch from 8ba5426 to fa033b5 Compare September 12, 2025 00:47
@vegeris vegeris changed the title Types pkg beta release feat-work-objects: beta version for the types pkg Sep 12, 2025
@vegeris vegeris merged commit d889e07 into feat-work-objects Sep 12, 2025
39 of 57 checks passed
@vegeris vegeris deleted the feat-work-objects-beta-bump-types branch September 12, 2025 01:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants