Skip to content

feat: add selinux module #1995

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zonyitoo merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2025
Merged

feat: add selinux module #1995

zonyitoo merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2025

Conversation

@f100024
Copy link
Contributor

@f100024 f100024 commented Jul 30, 2025

This policy provides several security improvements over running shadowsocks as unconfined_service_t:

  • Principle of least privilege: Only grants necessary permissions
  • Network isolation: Controls which ports and connections are allowed
  • File system protection: Restricts file access to configuration and required system files
  • Process isolation: Runs in a dedicated SELinux domain
  • Audit trail: All access attempts are logged for security monitoring

@zonyitoo zonyitoo merged commit 5d491bc into shadowsocks:master Aug 6, 2025
17 checks passed
@zonyitoo
Copy link
Collaborator

zonyitoo commented Aug 6, 2025

In the security points of view, how is SELinux compared with Docker? I think the Docker or cgroup related solution could provide more restriction about isolation.

@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@f100024 @zonyitoo