Conversation
this just disable some lints which should probably not: some of what they point too seems to be actual UB.
`missing_safety_doc` is to be ignored for clippy to be trully happy
Codecov ReportBase: 67.04% // Head: 67.07% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2587 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.04% 67.07% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 197 195 -2
Lines 29171 29018 -153
Branches 5743 5708 -35
==========================================
- Hits 19558 19464 -94
+ Misses 5055 5020 -35
+ Partials 4558 4534 -24
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
|
@trinity-1686a thanks for the PR! Just FYI, we're going to wait for review from @sporksmith to help address some of the remaining items before moving forward. |
|
Thanks for the cleanup! Once this gets merged maybe we should think about adding clippy to our lints GH workflow. |
Clippy had many complains. I tried to fix those I could, and added explicit
allow(clippy::...)for the others.I left
missing_safety_docalone: it triggers a lot, but in most case I'd lack the knowledge to actually do something intelligent about it.