Roadmapping: logging and data output #2727
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
json-based log output is a great idea, as it can be easily integrated into log aggregator systems such as Graylog (https://www.graylog.org/videos/json-extractor/). I mentioned during the dev meeting that there is a standard JSON fields, but I misremembered -- that's for web (e.g., Apache) logging. For at least Graylog, you can use whatever JSON fields you want, and just need to consider the "extractor" to have it imported into the log. Long story short, it'd be nice if there is an ability to send JSON-encoded log events over the network. Graylog, for example, supports both UDP and TCP, with the "format" of the message just being the raw JSON. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Are these changes scoped to Shadow itself, or is TGen also included? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We discussed how to make shadow's logging and data output more consistent and useful. Many of these items will require a major version bump.
FAQ:
user-facing statistics
dev-facing info (useful for debugging)
other (leave as-is)
items to remove
sstool in shadow (see sock_diag(7))Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions