Skip to content

[sgl-kernel code style] clean moe_align_block_size kernel token_cnts_buffer#8526

Merged
zhyncs merged 10 commits intocheng/dev/ep-kernelfrom
clean_moe_align_block_size_kernel
Jul 31, 2025
Merged

[sgl-kernel code style] clean moe_align_block_size kernel token_cnts_buffer#8526
zhyncs merged 10 commits intocheng/dev/ep-kernelfrom
clean_moe_align_block_size_kernel

Conversation

@BBuf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@BBuf BBuf commented Jul 29, 2025

Motivation

RT

图片

Modifications

Accuracy Test

Benchmark & Profiling

Checklist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @BBuf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've performed a code style cleanup by removing an unused "token_cnts_buffer" from the "moe_align_block_size" kernel. This change simplifies the function's interface and eliminates an unnecessary memory allocation, contributing to cleaner and potentially more efficient code. The modification impacts both the core implementation and related benchmark and test files, ensuring the removal is consistent across the codebase.

Highlights

  • Removal of Unused Buffer: The "token_cnts_buffer" variable and its associated parameter have been completely removed from the "moe_align_block_size" function across all its declarations, definitions, and calls.
  • Streamlined Function Signatures: The function signatures for "moe_align_block_size" in both Python and C++ (CUDA and ROCm extensions) have been updated to reflect the removal of the "token_cnts_buffer" parameter, streamlining the interface.
  • Deletion of Buffer Declarations: Declarations of "token_cnts_buffer" have been deleted from various files, including the main fused MoE implementation, benchmark scripts, and test files, ensuring consistency and reducing unnecessary memory allocation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a cleanup effort to remove the unused token_cnts_buffer from the moe_align_block_size kernel and its related functions. The changes are applied consistently across the Python and C++/CUDA codebase, including function definitions, calls, and corresponding updates in benchmarks and tests. The removal of the unused buffer is a good code hygiene practice. The changes look correct and I have no further comments.

@ispobock
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Split the python interface code change in another PR.

@BBuf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

BBuf commented Jul 29, 2025

Split the python interface code change in another PR.

Done.

@BBuf BBuf changed the base branch from main to cheng/dev/ep-kernel July 30, 2025 01:55
@BBuf BBuf requested a review from hnyls2002 as a code owner July 30, 2025 01:59
@zhyncs zhyncs merged commit 6e953d0 into cheng/dev/ep-kernel Jul 31, 2025
1 check passed
@zhyncs zhyncs deleted the clean_moe_align_block_size_kernel branch July 31, 2025 04:37
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants