Skip to content

Conversation

@mrobinson
Copy link
Member

I mistakenly made this method have public visibility in a recent PR

Testing: This doesn't change behavior and is thus covered by existing tests.
Fixes: #40667

I mistakenly made this method have public visibility in a recent PR

Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
@servo-highfive servo-highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Nov 16, 2025
@servo-highfive servo-highfive removed the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Nov 16, 2025
@yezhizhen
Copy link
Member

I think the issue is meant for some new comers.

@mrobinson mrobinson added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 16, 2025
@servo-highfive servo-highfive added the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Nov 16, 2025
@mrobinson
Copy link
Member Author

@yezhizhen I fixed this one because I originally made the mistake.

Merged via the queue into servo:main with commit 34af7fb Nov 16, 2025
35 checks passed
@mrobinson mrobinson deleted the pub-crate branch November 16, 2025 09:11
@servo-highfive servo-highfive removed the S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. label Nov 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Webview::set_history shouldn't be public

3 participants