Merged
Conversation
e31db98 to
e17cdfc
Compare
dcastro
reviewed
Jul 13, 2023
| The change log is available [on GitHub][2]. | ||
|
|
||
| Unreleased | ||
| 1.4.0 |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should update this as well:
I updated the version number in
o-clock.cabal.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, yep, actually I wanted to mark it as a draft while I'm messing with CI, but you were quite fast :D
I'll do it
dcastro
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2023
8408ad3 to
6b8c406
Compare
Nothing too serious: * https://hackage.haskell.org/package/doctest-0.22.1/changelog * https://hackage.haskell.org/package/hedgehog-1.3/changelog * https://github.com/sol/markdown-unlit/commits/main * https://hackage.haskell.org/package/aeson-2.2.0.0/changelog * https://hackage.haskell.org/package/tasty-1.5/changelog Aeson changelog is quite big, but we use it only for a couple of simple instances.
Problem: CI uses old versions of stack and cabal, also tests our package with old GHCs. Solution: update stack and cabal to the latest ones, update GHC versions to support the latest 4. Also update `tested-with`.
Problem: TypeInType extension is deprecated since some recent GHC version, but we are using it. Solution: use DataKinds and PolyKinds instead as GHC suggests.
6b8c406 to
09bda57
Compare
Problem: due to ghc/ghc@13d627b we get different output in doctest for GHC 9.6 and 9.4. So with 9.6 they started to fail. Solution: force redundant promotion ticks for now. Add a comment that we should remove it when we stop supporting older GHCs. Another option would be to use CPP, but we already have 2 cases and supporting 3 cases sounds too verbose.
09bda57 to
28c65b7
Compare
Problem: Haddock CI step tries to build haddock for everything and fails to do it for doctest for an obscure reason. Solution: we don't really care about Haddock for anything besides the library, so the easiest solution seems to be to build Haddock only for the library, which is the default.
We removed `toNum` some time ago, now it seems to be ok to release it. Since it's a breaking change, we are increasing the middle version component.
28c65b7 to
415f1cc
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Boring PR that updates some upper bounds and version in CI config.
Related issue(s)
None
✅ Checklist for your Pull Request
Ideally a PR has all of the checkmarks set.
If something in this list is irrelevant to your PR, you should still set this
checkmark indicating that you are sure it is dealt with (be that by irrelevance).
Related changes (conditional)
Tests
silently reappearing again.
Documentation
Public contracts
of Public Contracts policy.
and
Stylistic guide (mandatory)
✓ Release Checklist
o-clock.cabal.under the "Unreleased" section to a new section for this release version.
I added
@sincehaddock annotations.with a summary of all user-facing changes.
vX.Y.Z