cleanup: drop SWAR's 64-bit assumptions #140
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The SWAR code now operates on a register of the host CPU at a time as intended. Note this might actually not be faster on 32-bit, I would have to bench it but in some cases 4 memory reads / lookup-table reads might be faster than blockwide-operations
df301b6 to
e10d41e
Compare
seanmonstar
approved these changes
May 4, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The SWAR code now operates on a register of the host CPU at a time as intended.
Note this might actually not be faster on 32-bit, I would have to bench it but in some cases 4 memory reads / lookup-table reads might be faster than blockwide-operations