Skip to content

Conversation

@jl-wynen
Copy link
Member

@jl-wynen jl-wynen commented Aug 4, 2025

Fixes #3740

Consider reviewing commit by commit to understand how error codes and fixes are related.

I did not fix passedByValue (yet) because it looks like there are a lot of affected functions and I don't know how relevant this is for performance.

Copy link
Member

@SimonHeybrock SimonHeybrock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, looking at commits as you suggested.

@jl-wynen jl-wynen enabled auto-merge August 4, 2025 15:01
@jl-wynen jl-wynen force-pushed the fix-new-cppcheck branch 4 times, most recently from 6e652d4 to 16f1c76 Compare August 5, 2025 08:36
@jl-wynen jl-wynen merged commit 6be53ce into main Aug 5, 2025
4 checks passed
@jl-wynen jl-wynen deleted the fix-new-cppcheck branch August 5, 2025 08:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review cppcheck complaints after bumping the version 2.18.0

3 participants