FEA Add sample variance support for GaussianProcessRegressor.fit#24188
Open
wen-zheng wants to merge 17 commits intoscikit-learn:mainfrom
Open
FEA Add sample variance support for GaussianProcessRegressor.fit#24188wen-zheng wants to merge 17 commits intoscikit-learn:mainfrom
GaussianProcessRegressor.fit#24188wen-zheng wants to merge 17 commits intoscikit-learn:mainfrom
Conversation
add sample variance option in "fit" interface, make it more coherent/consistent with other estimators (i.e. "sample_weight" option in other estimators)
Author
Author
|
I will add test code for my pull request, please wait |
GaussianProcessRegressor.fit
ogrisel
reviewed
Aug 23, 2022
ogrisel
reviewed
Aug 23, 2022
Author
|
@ogrisel everything is ok |
Author
Author
|
@ogrisel ping, any suggestions? |
Author
|
@jjerphan ping, any suggestions? |
51 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
add sample variance option in "fit" interface, make it more coherent/consistent with other estimators (i.e. "sample_weight" option in other estimators)
Reference Issues/PRs
See also #7975, #7985, #7821
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
I add the sample_variance option in fit interface
Any other comments?