Add coderabbit review config#8032
Conversation
a0d9562 to
d9aca0e
Compare
|
@coderabbit.ai review |
d9aca0e to
d17f483
Compare
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
|
@coderabbit.ai does this configuration file agree with your latest schema? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1370 🛠 Debug Information Gathered
The validation shows:
Your configuration successfully:
All settings are being correctly parsed and applied as shown in the current configuration output. Your goal of reducing review noise through this configuration is properly implemented. |
lagru
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like an improvement in my book. Thanks.
.coderabbit.yaml
Outdated
| review_status: false | ||
| review_details: false | ||
| high_level_summary: false | ||
| estimate_code_review_effort: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't notice that it did that. That actually sounds useful to me and to contributors.
Tried to quiet down the coderabbit reviews a bit. Asked it to auto-label PRs—let's see how it goes.