Skip to content

Add coderabbit review config#8032

Merged
stefanv merged 3 commits intoscikit-image:mainfrom
stefanv:coderabbit-config
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

Add coderabbit review config#8032
stefanv merged 3 commits intoscikit-image:mainfrom
stefanv:coderabbit-config

Conversation

@stefanv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@stefanv stefanv commented Jan 21, 2026

Tried to quiet down the coderabbit reviews a bit. Asked it to auto-label PRs—let's see how it goes.

@stefanv stefanv added the 🤖 type: Infrastructure CI, packaging, tools and automation label Jan 21, 2026
@stefanv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

stefanv commented Jan 21, 2026

@coderabbit.ai review

@scikit-image scikit-image deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jan 21, 2026
@scikit-image scikit-image deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jan 21, 2026
@scikit-image scikit-image deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jan 21, 2026
@scikit-image scikit-image deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jan 21, 2026
@scikit-image scikit-image deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jan 21, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file that defines a review labeling schema (emoji tags and instructions), automation flags, and an auto_review section specifying base-branch and auto-apply behavior. No source code or API exports were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Review Workflow Configuration
.coderabbit.yaml
New repo-level configuration introducing labeled review categories (API, New feature, Maintenance, Bug fix, Documentation, Infrastructure, Enhancement, Performance), emoji tags, instructions, automation flags, and auto_review settings including base_branch: "main" and auto_apply_labels: true.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • lagru
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add coderabbit review config' directly and accurately summarizes the main change—adding a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file for review automation.
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains the intent behind the changes (quieting down reviews, auto-labeling PRs) and is clearly related to the configuration file addition.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@stefanv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

stefanv commented Jan 21, 2026

@coderabbit.ai does this configuration file agree with your latest schema?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@stefanv, let me check the configuration file and validate it against the latest schema.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Read the CodeRabbit configuration file
cat .coderabbit.yaml

Length of output: 1370


🛠 Debug Information Gathered


@stefanv, yes, your configuration file is valid and agrees with the latest schema! ✅

The validation shows:

  • No parsing errors (errorsLength: 0)
  • Schema version: v2
  • All fields are properly formatted and use valid values according to the schema

Your configuration successfully:

  • Sets the review profile to "chill" (less nitpicky)
  • Disables various walkthrough elements (review_status, review_details, high_level_summary, estimate_code_review_effort, in_progress_fortune, poem) to reduce noise
  • Configures 8 labeling instructions with emoji-prefixed labels
  • Enables automatic label application (auto_apply_labels: true)
  • Restricts automatic reviews to the main base branch

All settings are being correctly parsed and applied as shown in the current configuration output. Your goal of reducing review noise through this configuration is properly implemented.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lagru lagru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like an improvement in my book. Thanks.

.coderabbit.yaml Outdated
review_status: false
review_details: false
high_level_summary: false
estimate_code_review_effort: false
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice that it did that. That actually sounds useful to me and to contributors.

@stefanv stefanv merged commit e9f9652 into scikit-image:main Jan 21, 2026
22 of 25 checks passed
@stefanv stefanv added this to the 0.27 milestone Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖 type: Infrastructure CI, packaging, tools and automation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants