Description
It is important for a library to be consistent in arguments naming. The issue #4003 points out such problem.
I noticed for example that the argument for the "maximum number of iterations" has at least 5 names over skimage functions:
max_iter in slic,max_iterations in active_contour,iterations in richardson_lucy,n_iter_max in denoise_tv_chambolle,niter in optical_flow_tvl1.
What about defining standards for such common argument names and fixing the code base in the same spirit as #4152?
Description
It is important for a library to be consistent in arguments naming. The issue #4003 points out such problem.
I noticed for example that the argument for the "maximum number of iterations" has at least 5 names over
skimagefunctions:max_iterinslic,max_iterationsinactive_contour,iterationsinrichardson_lucy,n_iter_maxindenoise_tv_chambolle,niterinoptical_flow_tvl1.What about defining standards for such common argument names and fixing the code base in the same spirit as #4152?