Skip to content

ci: xfail failing cudf tests until fixed#3781

Merged
ikrommyd merged 1 commit intoscikit-hep:mainfrom
ikrommyd:xfail-cudf-tests
Dec 24, 2025
Merged

ci: xfail failing cudf tests until fixed#3781
ikrommyd merged 1 commit intoscikit-hep:mainfrom
ikrommyd:xfail-cudf-tests

Conversation

@ikrommyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In the latest cudf release, the internal column constructors have changed and we've been getting 3 failing tests consistently for GPU every single time. Even though the GPU tests are not required in ci to merge, it's still hard to see if those are the tests that failed every or if a PR breaks other GPU tests until we actually go and look inside the actions log.
I think it's the safest to xfail these tests until we have a fix so that we can easily know if GPU ci is broken or not. Also it will be immediately seen if these tests start passing unexpectedly or in the PR that aims to fix them.

@ikrommyd ikrommyd requested review from ariostas and ianna December 23, 2025 00:00
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.75%. Comparing base (f2416b5) to head (873efe0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ikrommyd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Now the GPU tests are passing. I personally prefer a green ci a lot more than continuing to merge with failing GPU tests that we have to manually check which tests fail inside.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The documentation preview is ready to be viewed at http://preview.awkward-array.org.s3-website.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/PR3781

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ariostas ariostas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @ikrommyd! Yeah, I think it's good to ignore these until they're fixed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ianna ianna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ikrommyd - ok, let’s do that until my pr is submitted - I have migrated this to the new cudf locally, but didn’t manage to push in time before the Christmas break 🎄

@ikrommyd ikrommyd merged commit 5a6e69f into scikit-hep:main Dec 24, 2025
39 checks passed
@ikrommyd ikrommyd deleted the xfail-cudf-tests branch December 24, 2025 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants