Skip to content

No protected accessor when accessing through self type#8835

Merged
lrytz merged 1 commit intoscala:2.13.xfrom
lrytz:t11924
May 27, 2021
Merged

No protected accessor when accessing through self type#8835
lrytz merged 1 commit intoscala:2.13.xfrom
lrytz:t11924

Conversation

@lrytz
Copy link
Member

@lrytz lrytz commented Mar 27, 2020

@lrytz lrytz requested a review from retronym March 27, 2020 14:42
@scala-jenkins scala-jenkins added this to the 2.13.3 milestone Mar 27, 2020
@lrytz
Copy link
Member Author

lrytz commented Apr 2, 2020

[error] scala-reflect: Failed binary compatibility check against org.scala-lang:scala-reflect:2.13.0! Found 1 potential problems (filtered 271)
[error]  * abstract synthetic method scala$reflect$runtime$SynchronizedOps$SynchronizedBaseTypeSeq$$super$maxDepthOfElems()Int in interface scala.reflect.runtime.SynchronizedOps#SynchronizedBaseTypeSeq is present only in other version
[error]    filter with: ProblemFilters.exclude[ReversedMissingMethodProblem]("scala.reflect.runtime.SynchronizedOps#SynchronizedBaseTypeSeq.scala$reflect$runtime$SynchronizedOps$SynchronizedBaseTypeSeq$$super$maxDepthOfElems")

Heh, so the fix removed an unnecessary protected accessor

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Oct 5, 2020

@lrytz is this ready for review? want to suggest a reviewer?

(the merge conflict is just in the mima filters)

@lrytz
Copy link
Member Author

lrytz commented Oct 6, 2020

Yep, this is ready. Review by @retronym.

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member

This needs a rebase. And a review/merge!

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

Rebased

@dwijnand dwijnand modified the milestones: 2.13.6, 2.13.7 May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

inconsistent logic when override self type method

5 participants