don't consider imports when typing package declaration name#10111
Merged
SethTisue merged 1 commit intoscala:2.13.xfrom Aug 18, 2022
Merged
don't consider imports when typing package declaration name#10111SethTisue merged 1 commit intoscala:2.13.xfrom
SethTisue merged 1 commit intoscala:2.13.xfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
I guess you mean once I was just looking at package names last spring because of scala/bug#12566 You just said about something "we need a mode for that." But was it this? |
Member
Author
Maybe I meant I could not find uses of the
I don't remember anything here :) |
retronym
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2022
Contributor
|
maybe retronym said somewhere we need a mode for this. Thanks again. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to Scala 3:
Before this PR, the
PackageDef.pidforb.xrefers to the package symbola.x.I couldn't spot any uses of
PackageDef.pidin the compiler, so it's probably benign.