Skip to content

Replace obsolete Bintray badge with Scaladex version#179

Merged
eed3si9n merged 1 commit intosbt:masterfrom
rtyley:patch-1
Nov 12, 2021
Merged

Replace obsolete Bintray badge with Scaladex version#179
eed3si9n merged 1 commit intosbt:masterfrom
rtyley:patch-1

Conversation

@rtyley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rtyley rtyley commented Nov 12, 2021

Unfortunately the Bintray badge on the readme just reads 'no longer available' these days:

Bintray version

However, this new Scaladex badge can replace the old Bintray badge - it summarises which versions of sbt are supported by sbt-buildinfo (and what the latest sbt-buildinfo version is for each of those sbt versions):

sbt-buildinfo Scala version support

More details on the badge format here: scalacenter/scaladex#660 (with sbt-focused support in scalacenter/scaladex#674).

Unfortunately the Bintray badge on the readme just reads [_'no longer available'_](https://jfrog.com/blog/into-the-sunset-bintray-jcenter-gocenter-and-chartcenter/) these days:

![Bintray version](https://img.shields.io/bintray/v/eed3si9n/sbt-plugins/sbt-buildinfo.svg)

However, this new Scaladex badge can replace the old Bintray badge - it summarises which versions of sbt are supported by sbt-buildinfo (and what the latest sbt-buildinfo version is for each of those sbt versions):

[![sbt-buildinfo Scala version support](https://index.scala-lang.org/sbt/sbt-buildinfo/sbt-buildinfo/latest-by-scala-version.svg?targetType=Sbt)](https://index.scala-lang.org/sbt/sbt-buildinfo/sbt-buildinfo)

More details on the badge format here: scalacenter/scaladex#660 (with sbt-focused support in scalacenter/scaladex#674).
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@eed3si9n eed3si9n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@eed3si9n eed3si9n merged commit fc36145 into sbt:master Nov 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants