New --read-group-strict Option For samtools view#2268
Closed
whitwham wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
"samtools view -r" includes reads that have no read group. Though this is mentioned in the man page it still could be confusing. This commit adds a new option to omit reads with no read groups from the -r and -R settings. It also adds text to the usage to clarify how these options act. Should address the concerns in samtools#2265.
5278a37 to
2e7e621
Compare
Member
Author
|
Closing in favour of another solution. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
samtools view -rincludes reads that have no read group. Though this is mentioned in the man page it still could be confusing.This commit adds a new option,
--read-group-strict, to omit reads with no read groups from the-rand-Rsettings. It also adds text to the usage to clarify how these options act.Should address the concerns in #2265.