feat(assertions): add Assert and Assertf
#638
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #638 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.39% 94.41% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 18 19 +1
Lines 3246 3261 +15
==========================================
+ Hits 3064 3079 +15
Misses 170 170
Partials 12 12
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
This PR adds C/C++ style assertions:
lo.Assertandlo.Assertf.Solves #634.
Feel free to correct my English as I'm not a native English speaker.
Checklist before requesting a review
Conventions
(ok bool)is often better than(err error)panic(...)must be limitedlo.Must0,lo.Must1,lo.Must2...)