Closed
Conversation
169fa06 to
5ae8487
Compare
1 task
5ae8487 to
527d6e6
Compare
1 task
fcd36c8 to
edd3312
Compare
1 task
edd3312 to
2e5fb3e
Compare
Member
Author
|
Obsolete (replaced by #1697). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CHANGELOG.mdentrySummary
Use rust-random/rand_core#26.
Details
This worked out nicely:
Array64since we can (and must!) use[u32; 64]rand::rng():(For whatever reason the first bench in a run is often slightly different; others are very close to prior performance which is not the case in #1686.)
Draft because: depends on unmerged PR.