Optionally allow expect and unwrap in tests#8802
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom May 8, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Yeah, the @bors r+ |
Contributor
|
📌 Commit 597f61b has been approved by |
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
This was referenced Oct 8, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses #1015, except it makes the new behavior optional.
The reason for the msrv-related changes is as follows.
Rather than expand
check_methodslist of arguments, it seemed easier to makecheck_methodsa method ofMethods, so thatcheck_methodscould accessMethods' fields.check_methodshad anmsrvparameter, which I consequently made a field ofMethods. But, to avoid adding a lifetime parameter toMethods, I made the field typeOption<RustcVersion>instead of the parameter's existing type,Option<&RustcVersion>. This seemed sensible sinceRustcVersionimplementsCopy. But this broke a lot of code that expected anOption<&RustcVersion>or&Option<RustcVersion>. I changed all of those occurrences toOption<RustcVersion>. IMHO, the code is better as a result of these changes, though.The msrv-related changes are in their own commit to (hopefully) ease review.
Closes #1015
changelog: optionally allow
expectandunwrapin testsr? @llogiq