Skip to content

Conversation

@pitaj
Copy link
Contributor

@pitaj pitaj commented Dec 30, 2025

Part 1 of stabilizing the new range types for #125687

stabilizes core::range::RangeInclusive and core::range::RangeInclusiveIter

I've removed the re-exports temporarily because from what I can tell, there's no way to make re-exports of stable items unstable. They will be added back and stabilized in a separate PR.

stabilizes `core::range::RangeInclusive`
and `core::range::RangeInclusiveIter`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 30, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 30, 2025

r? @jackh726

rustbot has assigned @jackh726.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

r? libs-api

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 31, 2025
@rustbot rustbot assigned BurntSushi and unassigned jackh726 Dec 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants