Skip to content

Conversation

@Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor

@Qelxiros Qelxiros commented Nov 18, 2025

Closes #149017

@Centril you're mentioned in the FIXME; do you have thoughts on this?

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 18, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 18, 2025

r? @JonathanBrouwer

rustbot has assigned @JonathanBrouwer.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@reddevilmidzy
Copy link
Member

How about adding the test mentioned in the issue?

fn main() {
    let x = vec![1];
    let y = [1];
    let _ = x == y;
    let _ = y == x;
}

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

r? libs

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-t-libs-api Status: Awaiting decision from T-libs-api and removed T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 26, 2025
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Jan 7, 2026

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2026

📌 Commit 4274547 has been approved by Amanieu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 7, 2026

📋 This PR cannot be approved because it currently has the following label: S-waiting-on-t-libs-api.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2026

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 7, 2026
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Jan 7, 2026

@bors r-

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jan 7, 2026
@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 7, 2026
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Jan 7, 2026

Actually this needs an FCP.

@rfcbot merge

@rust-rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Error encounted:
Provided team `` is invalid

@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Jan 7, 2026

@rfcbot merge libs-api

@Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready
(I think the labels are weird, but this certainly shouldn't be waiting on me)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. S-waiting-on-t-libs-api Status: Awaiting decision from T-libs-api

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing impl PartialEq<Vec<T>> for [T; N]

8 participants