Add ros_testing metapackage and ros2test CLI package#1
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
|
Running CI (running up to several system_tests and demo package to save time, using ros2/ros2#704 for a ros2.repos file):
Previous runs with known/unrelated failures:
|
|
What did we decide I should rename this repository to? |
ros2test/package.xml
Outdated
| schematypens="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"?> | ||
| <package format="2"> | ||
| <name>ros2test</name> | ||
| <version>0.8.1</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any particular reason for starting at this version? I don't think it matters where you start, but I was just curious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just matching the version of most of the other launch packages. Any other way you'd rather go about it? I don't have a strong preference and I can't tell if we have a stricter policy on this regard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since both are in separate repositories they will level independently. So there is no reason to align them now. Please start this repo with version 0.1.0.
I think we didn't really decide. I'm fine with either, though I used |
How about naming this repo |
Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <michel@ekumenlabs.com>
|
Tests seem unrelated though no less worrisome :/ |
Closes ros2/launch#208. This pull request adds:
ros_testing, theament_cmakeentrypoint package to launch testing in ROS2, bringing all necessary dependencies and providing a convenience CMake macro,add_ros_test()to register ROS2 launch tests.ros2test, theros2CLI extension package that provides atestcommand for ROS2 launch tests.