Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Audrow <audrow.nash@gmail.com>
I agree. I think |
I agree. I made an issue #541 and assigned it to myself. |
Followup to ros2/rcl_interfaces#103 that collided with #527
@audrow This test is quite fragile and depends on very specific elements from a package that's only an indirect dependency. For robustness it might be worth specifically having controlled test messages that can be versioned with the code to avoid the fragility of relying on things like comments in other packages to remain static. I don't think that there's a significant benefit/purpose to test builtin_interfaces/test_msgs specifically vs any message you define with the expected structure. Otherwise this package will be required to be released in lockstep with any change to the message definitions in builtin_interfaces or test_msgs.