Explicitly link against dl for dladdr()#48
Conversation
|
CI job showing A different but functionally identical commit makes |
|
Testing and: The Rpr job is expected to fail due to the previous ABI break (some packages in this repo depend on |
|
@cottsay would appreciate a RHEL-specific set of eyes on this one, thanks! |
4229e6e to
7076b64
Compare
cottsay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for iterating on a quick fix for this.
4c87434 to
f5fa292
Compare
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <bedard.christophe@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Scott K Logan <logans@cottsay.net> Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <christophe.bedard@apex.ai>
f5fa292 to
6f588bf
Compare
|
The test failures on aarch64 and RHEL are known, and match the nightlies. The Windows test failures are new, but I have a hard time seeing how this PR would cause them given its contents. I'm going to go ahead and merge this (and then do a new release here), and we'll see what happens. |
Fix regression introduced by #43 on RHEL.
It looks like we need to explicitly link against dl on RHEL. Note that, if
TRACETOOLS_LTTNG_ENABLED, LTTng's link flags already include-ldl.Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard bedard.christophe@gmail.com