Skip to content

rclcpp::Time::max() clock type support. (backport #2352)#2355

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoironfrom
mergify/bp/iron/pr-2352
Closed

rclcpp::Time::max() clock type support. (backport #2352)#2355
mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoironfrom
mergify/bp/iron/pr-2352

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 4, 2023

This is an automatic backport of pull request #2352 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

Signed-off-by: Tomoya Fujita <Tomoya.Fujita@sony.com>
(cherry picked from commit 76e2b26)
@fujitatomoya
Copy link
Collaborator

CI:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya self-assigned this Nov 4, 2023
RCLCPP_PUBLIC
static Time
max();
max(rcl_clock_type_t clock_type = RCL_SYSTEM_TIME); // NOLINT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know the answer to this, so this is just a question: does adding a default parameter to a method change the ABI? I would guess it does, but I'm not 100% sure about it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, i think we are introducing default argument here, that means changing default argument to the method, that is not guaranteed as ABI compatible change. (off topic, It would be nice if we have API/ABI checker with github workflow to add the lable on each PR for future enhancement.)

thanks for reminding me of that. i will go ahead to close this, and #2354

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants