Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
CI xenial just rclcpp |
Contributor
Author
|
Second attempt, set handler to null |
Contributor
Author
|
Xenial passed, CI on all the other platforms
|
Member
dhood
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2018
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like there is a false positive cpplint violation on xenial (ros2/build_farmer#147).
I'm guessing it either had an issue with the same variable name being used in the shared pointer deleter, or it didn't recognize execution stops at
throw_from_rcl_errorabove.First attempt: change variable name in lambda.
connects to ros2/build_farmer#147