Remove unused IntraProcessMessage#89
Conversation
|
See also ros2/rclcpp#1017 |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Brawner <brawner@gmail.com>
68fee97 to
4891d55
Compare
ivanpauno
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you move the Dummy msg here https://github.com/ros2/test_interface_files/tree/master/msg?
Thanks!
|
Creating a |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Brawner <brawner@gmail.com>
53da0cb to
f9b5432
Compare
|
Thanks @ivanpauno for the suggestion. It looks like there is already an Empty message there, so I'm going to use that instead for rclcpp. Latest commit removes Dummy. |
|
@ivanpauno @wjwwood The tests now pass. If someone could merge this for me, I would appreciate it. |
Merged both this PR and the one in |
|
Thank you!
…On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:37 PM Ivan Santiago Paunovic < ***@***.***> wrote:
@ivanpauno <https://github.com/ivanpauno> @wjwwood
<https://github.com/wjwwood> The tests now pass. If someone could merge
this for me, I would appreciate it.
Merged both this PR and the one in rclcpp.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#89 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH7D6ULHVKOXFZOXRRD36LRIPAXRANCNFSM4LCW7NRA>
.
|
IntraProcessMessage is no longer used except as a dummy message in rclcpp tests. This removes the message from rcl_interfaces and creates an empty message in test_msgs for those rclcpp tests. rclcpp doesn't depend on common_interfaces, but it already depended on test_msgs so this doesn't change its dependency count.
If reusing common_interfaces/empty.msg is better than creating an empty message I can switch to that instead.