Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
msg/Bool.msg
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| # This is an example message of using a primative datatype, bool. | |||
| # If you want to test with this that's fine, but if you are deploying | |||
| # it into a system you should create a semantically meaningful custom message. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tfoote consider
| # it into a system you should create a semantically meaningful custom message. | |
| # it into a system you should create a semantically meaningful message type. |
same elsewhere.
msg/Bool.msg
Outdated
| # This is an example message of using a primative datatype, bool. | ||
| # If you want to test with this that's fine, but if you are deploying | ||
| # it into a system you should create a semantically meaningful custom message. | ||
| # If you want to embed it in another message use the primative not this message. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tfoote consider:
| # If you want to embed it in another message use the primative not this message. | |
| # If you want to embed it in another message, use the primitive data type instead. |
same elsewhere.
msg/Bool.msg
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| # This is an example message of using a primative datatype, bool. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tfoote consider
| # This is an example message of using a primative datatype, bool. | |
| # This is an example message of using a primitive datatype, bool. |
Signed-off-by: Tully Foote <tfoote@osrfoundation.org>
|
Good suggestions, updated. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| # This is an example of using complex datatypes. | |||
| # It is not recommended to use directly. | |||
| # To use a similar datastruct please define a custom message with appropriate semantic meaning. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tfoote datastruct -- In other places we talk about data types in a similar, almost equivalent way. Consider standardizing the terminology.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I specifically chose datastruct here to refer to the structure as opposed to the type as the guidance is to make a new type (indirectly by the new message).
|
This pull request has been mentioned on ROS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.ros.org/t/soss-a-whole-new-approach-to-your-ros-1-ros-2-bridge/17040/18 |
This if following up ros2/common_interfaces#89