Skip to content

Replace rmq_qos_profile_t with rclcpp::QoS#1106

Merged
ahcorde merged 5 commits intorollingfrom
ahcorde/rolling/rclcpp_qos
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Replace rmq_qos_profile_t with rclcpp::QoS#1106
ahcorde merged 5 commits intorollingfrom
ahcorde/rolling/rclcpp_qos

Conversation

@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor

@ahcorde ahcorde commented Jul 7, 2025

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
ahcorde added 2 commits July 7, 2025 15:45
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
@ahcorde ahcorde requested a review from mikeferguson July 21, 2025 08:04
@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahcorde commented Jul 21, 2025

can you take a look @asymingt ?

Copy link
Member

@mikeferguson mikeferguson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good once CI passes (I presume we need to wait for the underlying changes to sync)

Copy link

@asymingt asymingt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one nit.

image_transport::TransportHints hints(this);
// Create subscriber with QoS matched to subscribed topic publisher
auto qos_profile = image_proc::getTopicQosProfile(this, topic);
rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = image_proc::getQosProfile(this, topic);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: There seems to be an inconsistency in this PR between whether we want to go auto qos_profile = ... or rclcpp::QoS qos_profile = .... It doesn't faze me which one we choose, but I think we should at least be internally consistent.

ahcorde added 2 commits July 29, 2025 13:23
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Hernandez Cordero <ahcorde@gmail.com>
@ahcorde
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahcorde commented Jul 29, 2025

testing is passing!

@ahcorde ahcorde merged commit ef25806 into rolling Jul 29, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@ahcorde ahcorde deleted the ahcorde/rolling/rclcpp_qos branch July 29, 2025 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants